Press "Enter" to skip to content

Female leadership can be considered as a better option


WRITING TASK 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.

Write about the following topic:

World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.


Sample Answer:

In recent years, there has been a growing debate over whether female leadership is more conducive to peace and stability than male leadership. While it is true that historical evidence suggests that violence and conflict were more prevalent under male leadership, it is overly simplistic to attribute this solely to gender. In this essay, I will argue that the effectiveness of leadership in promoting peace and stability is not determined by gender, but rather by the individual qualities and skills of the leader.

Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that the historical prevalence of violence and conflict under male leadership can be attributed to a variety of factors, including societal norms, power dynamics, and historical contexts. It is not fair to make a blanket statement that female leadership is inherently more peaceful without considering these complexities. Furthermore, there have been instances of female leaders who have engaged in violent and aggressive actions, just as there have been male leaders who have championed peace and diplomacy.

Additionally, the effectiveness of leadership in promoting peace and stability is not solely determined by gender, but by the individual qualities and skills of the leader. Effective leadership requires qualities such as empathy, communication, negotiation, and conflict resolution skills, which are not inherently tied to gender. There are both male and female leaders who possess these qualities and have been successful in promoting peace and stability in their respective roles.

In conclusion, while historical evidence may suggest that violence and conflict were more prevalent under male leadership, it is important to recognize that the effectiveness of leadership in promoting peace and stability is not determined by gender. Instead, it is determined by the individual qualities and skills of the leader. Therefore, it is not accurate to claim that female leadership is inherently more conducive to peace. Rather, effective leadership for peace can be found in individuals of any gender who possess the necessary qualities and skills.


More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay


Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *