Press "Enter" to skip to content

Historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin


WRITING TASK 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.

Write about the following topic:

It is often argued by many that historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.


Sample Answer:

There is a longstanding debate surrounding the repatriation of historical objects to their country of origin. While some argue that these artifacts belong to their place of origin and should be returned, others believe that they should remain in the possession of the institutions that currently house them. In my opinion, I believe that historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin, as they hold significant cultural and historical value for the people of that nation.

First and foremost, historical objects are a vital part of a country’s cultural heritage. These artifacts often hold great sentimental value for the people of the country they originated from, and their return can help to preserve and promote the cultural identity of that nation. For example, the return of the Elgin Marbles to Greece would not only be a source of national pride but would also allow the Greek people to connect with their rich historical past.

Furthermore, the repatriation of historical objects can also help to address the issue of colonialism and cultural appropriation. Many of these artifacts were taken from their countries of origin during periods of colonialism and imperialism, and their return can serve as a step towards rectifying the injustices of the past. By returning these objects, it acknowledges the historical wrongs committed and allows for a more equitable distribution of cultural heritage.

However, it is important to consider the practical implications of repatriating historical objects. Many institutions that currently house these artifacts have invested significant resources in their preservation and display. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that the receiving country has the capacity to properly care for and display these objects once they are returned.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, I firmly believe that historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin. The cultural and historical significance of these artifacts for the people of the nation cannot be overstated, and their return can help to address the historical injustices of colonialism and imperialism. It is essential to approach repatriation with sensitivity and collaboration between nations to ensure the preservation and promotion of our global cultural heritage.


More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay


Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *