WRITING TASK 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.
Write about the following topic:
Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
In today’s world, the issue of balancing human needs with the preservation of endangered animal habitats is a contentious one. While some argue that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry take precedence over saving land for endangered animals, I firmly believe that both are equally important and can coexist harmoniously.
Firstly, it is undeniable that humans have a basic need for farmland, housing, and industry in order to sustain and improve their quality of life. Farmland is essential for growing crops and raising livestock to feed a growing global population. Housing is necessary for providing shelter and security for individuals and families, while industry is crucial for economic growth and job creation. These needs cannot be ignored or dismissed, as they are fundamental to human survival and progress.
However, it is equally important to consider the preservation of land for endangered animals. Biodiversity is essential for the health of the planet, and many species are at risk of extinction due to habitat destruction and human encroachment. By saving land for endangered animals, we are not only protecting these species, but also preserving the delicate balance of ecosystems and ensuring the long-term sustainability of our planet.
Moreover, it is possible to find a middle ground that accommodates both human needs and the preservation of endangered animal habitats. Sustainable land use practices, such as agroforestry and urban planning, can allow for the coexistence of farmland, housing, and industry with protected wildlife areas. Additionally, technological advancements and innovation can help minimize the impact of human activities on endangered animal habitats.
In conclusion, I disagree with the notion that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Both are vital for the well-being of our planet and its inhabitants, and it is essential to find a balance that allows for the sustainable coexistence of both. By prioritizing conservation efforts and implementing responsible land use practices, we can ensure a future where both humans and endangered animals thrive.