Press "Enter" to skip to content

In some countries it has been made illegal for people to smoke in all public places


You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.

Write about the following topic:

It has been proven that smoking kills. In some countries, it has been made illegal for people to smoke in all public places except in certain areas. All countries should make these rules. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Sample Answer:

In today’s world, the detrimental effects of smoking on both the individual and the wider community are well-documented. As such, it is my firm belief that all countries should implement laws that restrict smoking in public places, with the exception of designated areas. In this essay, I will outline the reasons for my stance and provide evidence to support it.

First and foremost, smoking poses a significant threat to public health. Secondhand smoke is a known carcinogen, and exposure to it can lead to a range of serious health issues, including respiratory problems and heart disease. By allowing smoking in public places, we are putting the health of non-smokers at risk. This is a clear violation of their right to clean air and a healthy environment. Therefore, it is the responsibility of governments to protect the public from the dangers of secondhand smoke by enacting laws that prohibit smoking in all public spaces.

Moreover, implementing such laws can have a positive impact on smoking rates. Research has shown that when smoking is banned in public places, the number of smokers decreases. This is because smokers are less likely to light up when they are not surrounded by others who are smoking. By creating smoke-free environments, we can encourage smokers to quit and deter young people from taking up the habit in the first place.

It is also important to consider the economic benefits of implementing smoking bans. The costs associated with treating smoking-related illnesses are substantial, and they place a significant burden on healthcare systems. By reducing the prevalence of smoking, governments can save money and allocate resources more effectively.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that all countries should enact laws that prohibit smoking in public places. Doing so will protect the health of non-smokers, reduce smoking rates, and yield economic benefits. It is time for governments to take decisive action to create smoke-free environments for the benefit of all.

More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *