WRITING TASK 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.
Write about the following topic:
Some people believe that old buildings should be protected by law. Others, however, think that they should be replaced by new buildings. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
There is a debate about whether old buildings should be protected by law or replaced by new buildings. Both perspectives have valid arguments, and it is important to consider the benefits and drawbacks of each before forming an opinion.
Those who advocate for the protection of old buildings argue that they hold historical and cultural significance. These buildings often represent a community’s heritage and can serve as a reminder of the past. Preserving them can help maintain a sense of identity and continuity in a rapidly changing world. Additionally, old buildings can be repurposed for modern use, reducing the need for new construction and its associated environmental impact.
On the other hand, proponents of replacing old buildings with new ones argue that modern structures are often more efficient and safer. New buildings can be designed to meet current standards for energy efficiency, accessibility, and structural integrity. Furthermore, replacing old buildings with new ones can contribute to urban revitalization and economic development, attracting businesses and residents to the area.
In my opinion, both perspectives have their merits, and the best approach lies in finding a balance between preservation and progress. It is important to protect historically and culturally significant buildings, as they contribute to the character and identity of a community. However, this should be balanced with the need for modernization and development. In some cases, it may be more practical to repurpose old buildings for contemporary use, while in other cases, the construction of new buildings may be necessary to meet the evolving needs of a community.
In conclusion, the debate over whether old buildings should be protected or replaced by new ones is complex and multifaceted. While the preservation of historical and cultural heritage is important, it is also essential to embrace innovation and progress. Finding a middle ground that respects the past while looking towards the future is crucial in addressing this issue.