WRITING TASK 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.
Write about the following topic:
In a public-funded healthcare system, people who are willing to pay for the best and fast treatment should be able to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
In a public-funded healthcare system, the question of whether individuals should be allowed to pay for expedited and superior treatment is a contentious issue. While some argue that this practice would create a two-tiered healthcare system, I believe that individuals should be able to access the treatment they desire, as long as it does not compromise the quality of care for others.
Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that in a public-funded healthcare system, the primary goal is to provide equal access to healthcare for all individuals, regardless of their financial status. Allowing people to pay for faster and better treatment could potentially create a divide between those who can afford it and those who cannot, leading to inequalities in healthcare access. This could undermine the fundamental principles of fairness and equality that underpin public-funded healthcare systems.
On the other hand, it is also important to consider the individual’s autonomy and right to make decisions about their own health. If someone is willing and able to pay for expedited and superior treatment, they should have the freedom to do so. This could potentially alleviate the burden on the public healthcare system, as individuals who can afford private treatment may choose to opt out of the public system, thereby reducing wait times and resource constraints for others.
In my opinion, a balance can be struck by implementing regulations that ensure the availability of high-quality care for all individuals, regardless of their ability to pay. This could involve setting limits on the extent to which individuals can pay for expedited treatment, as well as ensuring that the public healthcare system is adequately funded to provide timely and effective care for everyone.
In conclusion, while I recognize the potential drawbacks of allowing individuals to pay for the best and fast treatment in a public-funded healthcare system, I believe that it is ultimately important to respect individuals’ autonomy and freedom to make decisions about their own health. However, it is crucial to implement safeguards to prevent the creation of a two-tiered healthcare system and ensure that high-quality care is accessible to all.