Press "Enter" to skip to content

Public health can be improved if the government make laws


WRITING TASK 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.

Write about the following topic:

Some people think that the public health of a country can be improved if the government make laws regarding nutritious food but others think that it is a matter of personal choice and personal responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.


Sample Answer:

In recent years, there has been a growing debate about the role of government in improving public health through the implementation of laws regarding nutritious food. While some argue that it is the responsibility of the government to regulate the food industry and promote healthy eating habits, others believe that it is a matter of personal choice and personal responsibility. In this essay, I will discuss both views and provide my opinion on the matter.

On the one hand, proponents of government intervention argue that laws regarding nutritious food are necessary to address the rising rates of obesity and related health problems. They believe that the food industry often prioritizes profit over public health, leading to the availability of unhealthy and processed foods that contribute to poor dietary habits. By implementing laws that regulate the production, marketing, and labeling of food products, the government can ensure that citizens have access to nutritious and wholesome options. Furthermore, they argue that education alone is not enough to combat the pervasive influence of the food industry and that legal measures are necessary to protect the public’s health.

On the other hand, opponents of government intervention argue that individuals should have the freedom to make their own dietary choices without interference from the government. They believe that personal responsibility plays a crucial role in maintaining good health and that individuals should be empowered to make informed decisions about their diet. Furthermore, they argue that government regulations can be overly paternalistic and may infringe upon personal freedoms. Instead of relying on laws, they advocate for greater emphasis on education and public awareness campaigns to promote healthy eating habits.

In my opinion, while personal responsibility is important, the government has a crucial role to play in improving public health through the regulation of nutritious food. It is undeniable that the food industry has a significant impact on the dietary choices available to consumers, and without proper regulation, it is unlikely that individuals will have access to the necessary resources to make healthy choices. Therefore, I believe that a combination of government intervention and personal responsibility is essential in addressing public health concerns related to nutrition.

In conclusion, the debate over government laws regarding nutritious food is complex and multifaceted. While some argue for the importance of personal responsibility, others emphasize the need for government intervention. Ultimately, a balanced approach that respects personal freedoms while also addressing systemic issues in the food industry is necessary to improve public health.


More Writing Task 2 Sample Essay


Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *