WRITING TASK 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.
Write about the following topic:
Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
It is a widely debated topic whether former prisoners are the best candidates to educate teenagers about the perils of engaging in criminal activities. In my opinion, I agree to a certain extent that individuals who have been incarcerated can be effective in conveying the consequences of committing a crime to young people.
Firstly, ex-convicts have firsthand experience of the repercussions of their actions, and they can offer a unique perspective on the negative impact of criminal behavior. Their personal stories of the hardships they faced during their time in prison and the difficulties they encountered after their release can serve as a cautionary tale for impressionable teenagers. This real-life experience can make a strong impression on young minds and potentially deter them from making similar mistakes.
Moreover, former prisoners who have successfully rehabilitated themselves and reintegrated into society can serve as inspiring role models for at-risk youth. Their stories of redemption and the positive changes they have made in their lives can instill hope and motivation in teenagers who may be heading down a dangerous path. By showing that it is possible to turn their lives around and become productive members of society, these individuals can offer valuable guidance and support to young people who are at risk of falling into a life of crime.
However, it is important to acknowledge that not all ex-convicts are capable of effectively communicating their experiences to teenagers. Some may still harbor negative attitudes or behaviors that could potentially influence impressionable minds in a detrimental way. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully select individuals who have truly reformed and are committed to steering young people away from criminal activities.
In conclusion, while it is true that some former prisoners can be powerful advocates for crime prevention, it is essential to assess their suitability and ensure that they are capable of delivering a positive and impactful message to teenagers. When chosen thoughtfully, these individuals can play a valuable role in deterring young people from making destructive choices and guiding them towards a more positive future.