WRITING TASK 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.
Write about the following topic:
In some areas of the US, a ‘curfew’ is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult. What is your opinion about this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
In some areas of the US, a curfew is imposed on teenagers, restricting their outdoor activities after a certain time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult. This measure has sparked a debate regarding its effectiveness and ethical implications.
On one hand, proponents of the curfew argue that it helps to reduce juvenile crime and keeps young people safe. They believe that by limiting the time teenagers spend outside at night, the risk of them getting involved in criminal activities or becoming victims of crime is significantly reduced. Additionally, it is argued that the curfew encourages responsible behavior and discipline among young people, as they are required to adhere to the rules set by the authorities.
On the other hand, opponents of the curfew argue that it infringes upon the rights and freedoms of teenagers. They believe that imposing such restrictions on young people only serves to create a sense of mistrust and alienation, leading to potential resentment and rebellion. Moreover, critics argue that the curfew fails to address the root causes of juvenile delinquency and crime, such as poverty, lack of opportunities, and social inequality.
In my opinion, while the intention behind the curfew may be to protect and ensure the safety of teenagers, it is not the most effective or ethical approach. Instead of imposing restrictions, efforts should be focused on addressing the underlying issues that contribute to juvenile crime and delinquency. This could involve investing in community programs, providing educational and employment opportunities, and fostering positive relationships between young people and their communities.
Furthermore, rather than treating all teenagers as potential troublemakers, it is important to recognize and support those who are law-abiding and responsible. Building trust and communication between young people and the authorities can go a long way in promoting a sense of accountability and respect for the law.
In conclusion, while the imposition of curfews may be well-intentioned, it is crucial to consider the long-term implications and seek alternative solutions that respect the rights and dignity of teenagers while addressing the root causes of juvenile crime.