WRITING TASK 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge.
Write about the following topic:
Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
There are differing opinions on the protection of wild animals. Some argue that all wild animals should be protected, while others believe that only a select few should be protected. Both views have their merits, and it is important to consider the implications of each perspective.
Those who advocate for the protection of all wild animals argue that every species plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem. They contend that by protecting all wild animals, we can preserve biodiversity and ensure the survival of various species. Additionally, they argue that it is our ethical responsibility to protect all living creatures and that every animal has intrinsic value and deserves to be safeguarded.
On the other hand, proponents of protecting only a few wild animals argue that it is not feasible to protect every species due to limited resources and funding. They suggest that focusing on conserving a select few flagship species, such as elephants, tigers, and rhinos, can have a more significant impact on the overall ecosystem. By prioritizing the protection of these iconic species, they argue that we can indirectly protect other species that share the same habitat.
In my opinion, while the idea of protecting all wild animals is noble, it may not be practical given the limited resources and the vast number of species. Therefore, I believe that it is more realistic to focus on protecting a few key species that have a significant impact on their ecosystems. By doing so, we can ensure the survival of these flagship species and indirectly protect other species that rely on the same habitat.
In conclusion, the debate over whether all wild animals should be protected or only a few should be safeguarded is a complex issue. While both views have their merits, I believe that prioritizing the protection of a select few flagship species is a more pragmatic approach that can have a positive impact on the overall conservation of wild animals.