“The burning of oil for transport especially in private cars is wasteful and environmentally irresponsible. Taxation on petrol and diesel fuel should be increased to very high level to discourage the use of private cars. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?”
Sample Answer:
The issue of increasing taxation on petrol and diesel fuel to discourage the use of private cars is a complex and contentious one. While it is undeniable that the burning of oil for transport is environmentally harmful, the idea of significantly increasing fuel taxes raises important questions about equity and practicality.
On one hand, there is a strong argument to be made for discouraging the use of private cars as a means of reducing carbon emissions and mitigating climate change. Higher fuel taxes could incentivize individuals to seek out alternative modes of transportation such as public transit, cycling, or walking. This could lead to a reduction in traffic congestion and air pollution, as well as a decrease in the overall demand for oil.
On the other hand, it is important to consider the potential impact of increased fuel taxes on low-income individuals and families. For many people, private cars are a necessity rather than a luxury, especially in areas with limited public transportation options. Higher fuel prices could disproportionately burden those who can least afford it, leading to increased financial strain and potential social inequities.
In addition, the practicality of implementing and enforcing significantly higher fuel taxes should be carefully considered. It is crucial to ensure that any policy changes take into account the diverse needs and circumstances of different communities, and that viable alternatives to private car usage are readily available.
In conclusion, while the idea of increasing taxation on petrol and diesel fuel to discourage the use of private cars has its merits in terms of environmental responsibility, it is important to approach this issue with a balanced and nuanced perspective. Any policy changes should carefully consider the potential social and economic impacts, and strive to provide equitable and practical solutions for all members of society.
Be First to Comment